|
03-17-2016, 12:39 PM,
|
|
|
Posts: 1,271
Threads: 966
Joined: Nov 2014
Reputation:
1
|
|
Merrick Garland(Supreme Court Nominee) a good choice for the 2nd?
Posts: 1,271
Threads: 966
Joined: Nov 2014
Reputation:
1
03-17-2016, 12:39 PM
Merrick Garland, a good choice for the 2nd?
|
|
|
Find
|
03-17-2016, 02:38 PM,
|
|
|
Posts: 1,393
Threads: 79
Joined: Jul 2014
Reputation:
2
|
|
RE: Merrick Garland(Supreme Court Nominee) a good choice for the 2nd?
Posts: 1,393
Threads: 79
Joined: Jul 2014
Reputation:
2
Obama thinks he's clever.
|
|
|
Find
|
03-17-2016, 03:53 PM,
|
|
|
|
Posts: 1,271
Threads: 966
Joined: Nov 2014
Reputation:
1
|
|
|
RE: Merrick Garland(Supreme Court Nominee) a good choice for the 2nd?
Posts: 1,271
Threads: 966
Joined: Nov 2014
Reputation:
1
Yes, they actually are. They think things through much better than the party I am in!
|
|
|
Find
|
03-17-2016, 07:08 PM,
|
|
|
Posts: 320
Threads: 14
Joined: Jun 2015
Reputation:
0
|
|
RE: Merrick Garland(Supreme Court Nominee) a good choice for the 2nd?
Posts: 320
Threads: 14
Joined: Jun 2015
Reputation:
0
Even though I did know about the vote against DC gun possession, you don't need to know anything about Obama's nominations. If its someone Obama wants on the Supreme Court, there's no way they could be good for the country. I don't care who the choice is, if its someone Obama wants, by default its someone I don't want anywhere near the Supreme Court.
|
|
|
Find
|
03-18-2016, 09:28 AM,
|
|
|
|
Posts: 1,271
Threads: 966
Joined: Nov 2014
Reputation:
1
|
|
|
RE: Merrick Garland(Supreme Court Nominee) a good choice for the 2nd?
Posts: 1,271
Threads: 966
Joined: Nov 2014
Reputation:
1
(03-17-2016, 07:08 PM)British Gunner Wrote: Even though I did know about the vote against DC gun possession, you don't need to know anything about Obama's nominations. If its someone Obama wants on the Supreme Court, there's no way they could be good for the country. I don't care who the choice is, if its someone Obama wants, by default its someone I don't want anywhere near the Supreme Court. There is some buzz that maybe congress should vote for him, because Hillary could get in and pick much worse. I think that would be a mistake. But according to the polls, Hillary has a very good chance at becoming a president. A real no win situation and cleaver. It puts everyone in a tough spot.
(03-17-2016, 07:08 PM)British Gunner Wrote: Even though I did know about the vote against DC gun possession, you don't need to know anything about Obama's nominations. If its someone Obama wants on the Supreme Court, there's no way they could be good for the country. I don't care who the choice is, if its someone Obama wants, by default its someone I don't want anywhere near the Supreme Court.There is some buzz that maybe congress should vote for him, because Hillary could get in and pick much worse. I think that would be a mistake. But according to the polls, Hillary has a very good chance at becoming a president. A real no win situation and cleaver. It puts everyone in a tough spot.
|
|
|
Find
|
03-18-2016, 03:30 PM,
|
|
|
Posts: 607
Threads: 35
Joined: Jan 2015
Reputation:
0
|
|
RE: Merrick Garland(Supreme Court Nominee) a good choice for the 2nd?
Posts: 607
Threads: 35
Joined: Jan 2015
Reputation:
0
I don't think Hitlery's choices would be any different from the Commie-n-Chief's. They both go by the same playbook. I wouldn't want anyone that would be picked by the current crop of Demoncrats.
|
|
|
Find
|
03-21-2016, 12:46 PM,
|
|
|
Posts: 794
Threads: 142
Joined: Jun 2014
Reputation:
0
|
|
RE: Merrick Garland(Supreme Court Nominee) a good choice for the 2nd?
Posts: 794
Threads: 142
Joined: Jun 2014
Reputation:
0
Well, now that Obama has done his duty, it's up to Congress to vet his choice, and just a quickly deny the position to Garland.
|
|
|
Find
|
03-22-2016, 07:34 AM,
|
|
|
|
Posts: 1,393
Threads: 79
Joined: Jul 2014
Reputation:
2
|
|
RE: Merrick Garland(Supreme Court Nominee) a good choice for the 2nd?
Posts: 1,393
Threads: 79
Joined: Jul 2014
Reputation:
2
(03-21-2016, 12:46 PM)ssphoto Wrote: Well, now that Obama has done his duty, it's up to Congress to vet his choice, and just a quickly deny the position to Garland.
And when 1/3 of Congress is occupied in an election year coupled with that year being a Presidential election which dramatically effects those elections, a proper vetting is not even possible.
If the republicans had any brains, then they would do all the preliminary work first, wait for the election in November, then if Hillary wins approve Garland before she takes the oath if they believe she would do worse.
![[Image: CatGun5_zpsxcamfme3.jpg]](http://i1298.photobucket.com/albums/ag44/daniel_utz1/CatGun5_zpsxcamfme3.jpg)
(03-21-2016, 12:46 PM)ssphoto Wrote: Well, now that Obama has done his duty, it's up to Congress to vet his choice, and just a quickly deny the position to Garland.
And when 1/3 of Congress is occupied in an election year coupled with that year being a Presidential election which dramatically effects those elections, a proper vetting is not even possible.
If the republicans had any brains, then they would do all the preliminary work first, wait for the election in November, then if Hillary wins approve Garland before she takes the oath if they believe she would do worse.
|
|
|
Find
|
Board
Search
Member List
Calendar
Red Dot Arms
Help
