|
06-10-2015, 02:38 PM,
|
|
|
Posts: 1,393
Threads: 79
Joined: Jul 2014
Reputation:
2
|
|
American Keith Broomfield Killed Fighting Against ISIS in Syria
Posts: 1,393
Threads: 79
Joined: Jul 2014
Reputation:
2
|
|
|
Find
|
06-11-2015, 01:51 AM,
|
|
|
Posts: 160
Threads: 12
Joined: May 2015
Reputation:
0
|
|
RE: American Keith Broomfield Killed Fighting Against ISIS in Syria
Posts: 160
Threads: 12
Joined: May 2015
Reputation:
0
sad but he fought bravely and mad us proud. RIP
|
|
|
Find
|
06-13-2015, 12:31 PM,
|
|
|
Posts: 958
Threads: 21
Joined: Sep 2014
Reputation:
1
|
|
American Keith Broomfield Killed Fighting Against ISIS in Syria
Posts: 958
Threads: 21
Joined: Sep 2014
Reputation:
1
No words can explain the bravery of Keith Broomfield. It's truly shameful that Obama won't send more than 450 troops to eradicate ISIS, yet several Americans like Keith Broomfield voluntarily continue to help the Kurds. I hope Mr. Broomfield was able to kill some of the opposition effort his life was taken.
Click Here ~~~~>Glock Often Imitated....Never Duplicated
Click Here ~~~~>Glock Often Imitated....Never Duplicated
|
|
|
Find
|
06-18-2015, 03:43 PM,
|
|
|
Posts: 794
Threads: 142
Joined: Jun 2014
Reputation:
0
|
|
RE: American Keith Broomfield Killed Fighting Against ISIS in Syria
Posts: 794
Threads: 142
Joined: Jun 2014
Reputation:
0
I appreciate the sacrifice and support those Americans that want to kick ISIS' butt. However, I don't support sending more regular troops over there. Until the Sunnis/Shiites/Kurds and other groups can come to terms with their religion and political differences, I think we should stay out! Let other Arab countries do the heavy lifting. They do have modern weaponry and powerful armies.
Now, that being said, we didn't win WW2 by being nice to the enemy and innocent lives were taken. In fact, we were just a brutal as the enemy in many respects. If we are going to get involved as a primary role, then we should go in FULL FORCE and annihilate them. (I don't see this as a viable option really, but going in with one arm tied behind the back is no way to win a war). Full force does not mean standing armies necessarily, but to the fullest extent we can use our tech to achieve our objective.
Now, that being said, we didn't win WW2 by being nice to the enemy and innocent lives were taken. In fact, we were just a brutal as the enemy in many respects. If we are going to get involved as a primary role, then we should go in FULL FORCE and annihilate them. (I don't see this as a viable option really, but going in with one arm tied behind the back is no way to win a war). Full force does not mean standing armies necessarily, but to the fullest extent we can use our tech to achieve our objective.
|
|
|
Find
|
06-20-2015, 01:16 PM,
|
|
|
|
Posts: 958
Threads: 21
Joined: Sep 2014
Reputation:
1
|
|
American Keith Broomfield Killed Fighting Against ISIS in Syria
Posts: 958
Threads: 21
Joined: Sep 2014
Reputation:
1
(06-18-2015, 03:43 PM)ssphoto Wrote: I appreciate the sacrifice and support those Americans that want to kick ISIS' butt. However, I don't support sending more regular troops over there. Until the Sunnis/Shiites/Kurds and other groups can come to terms with their religion and political differences, I think we should stay out! Let other Arab countries do the heavy lifting. They do have modern weaponry and powerful armies.
Now, that being said, we didn't win WW2 by being nice to the enemy and innocent lives were taken. In fact, we were just a brutal as the enemy in many respects. If we are going to get involved as a primary role, then we should go in FULL FORCE and annihilate them. (I don't see this as a viable option really, but going in with one arm tied behind the back is no way to win a war). Full force does not mean standing armies necessarily, but to the fullest extent we can use our tech to achieve our objective.
I agree 100% with a few additions. Place sanctions on all U.S. trade, freeze all financial accounts and dealings on any Arab country not willing to participate 100% in stopping ISIS and other Mid East terrorist groups. Including Iran and Pakistan!
Click Here ~~~~>Glock Often Imitated....Never Duplicated
(06-18-2015, 03:43 PM)ssphoto Wrote: I appreciate the sacrifice and support those Americans that want to kick ISIS' butt. However, I don't support sending more regular troops over there. Until the Sunnis/Shiites/Kurds and other groups can come to terms with their religion and political differences, I think we should stay out! Let other Arab countries do the heavy lifting. They do have modern weaponry and powerful armies.
Now, that being said, we didn't win WW2 by being nice to the enemy and innocent lives were taken. In fact, we were just a brutal as the enemy in many respects. If we are going to get involved as a primary role, then we should go in FULL FORCE and annihilate them. (I don't see this as a viable option really, but going in with one arm tied behind the back is no way to win a war). Full force does not mean standing armies necessarily, but to the fullest extent we can use our tech to achieve our objective.
I agree 100% with a few additions. Place sanctions on all U.S. trade, freeze all financial accounts and dealings on any Arab country not willing to participate 100% in stopping ISIS and other Mid East terrorist groups. Including Iran and Pakistan!
Click Here ~~~~>Glock Often Imitated....Never Duplicated
|
|
|
Find
|
Board
Search
Member List
Calendar
Red Dot Arms
Help
