Board
Search
Member List
Calendar
Red Dot Arms
Help
(02-12-2015, 02:13 PM)ssphoto Wrote: It's amazing that even in today's age this is still a debate. I myself support a woman's right to choose, as long as it's not too far into the pregnancy.
I am curious about what you mean as "today's age".
The right to choose is not at debate. Everyone who is pro-life is infinitely more in favor of choice than those who call themselves pro-choice.
The debate is only and has always been only about when, as in how far into the pregnancy.
And that is to say when does life begin. THAT's the debate, not "choice or not choice". "Pro-Choice" is nothing but a purposeful deflection of the real debate.
Having clarified that here is the reason for the deflection. It is a logical point that cannot be honestly disagreed with. The pro-choicers simply do not want to face it.
Here it is. No one knows when life begins. Religions take in on faith and science cannot even come up with a standard definition let alone a determination.
Therefore, if a woman does not know for sure if her child is alive and NO WOMAN KNOWS FOR SURE, then how can you abort when you might just be killing your baby?
It is just too perverse and disturbing to consider, unless you simply close your eyes and say the word "choice".
(02-12-2015, 02:13 PM)ssphoto Wrote: It's amazing that even in today's age this is still a debate. I myself support a woman's right to choose, as long as it's not too far into the pregnancy.
I am curious about what you mean as "today's age".
The right to choose is not at debate. Everyone who is pro-life is infinitely more in favor of choice than those who call themselves pro-choice.
The debate is only and has always been only about when, as in how far into the pregnancy.
And that is to say when does life begin. THAT's the debate, not "choice or not choice". "Pro-Choice" is nothing but a purposeful deflection of the real debate.
Having clarified that here is the reason for the deflection. It is a logical point that cannot be honestly disagreed with. The pro-choicers simply do not want to face it.
Here it is. No one knows when life begins. Religions take in on faith and science cannot even come up with a standard definition let alone a determination.
Therefore, if a woman does not know for sure if her child is alive and NO WOMAN KNOWS FOR SURE, then how can you abort when you might just be killing your baby?
It is just too perverse and disturbing to consider, unless you simply close your eyes and say the word "choice".
I am curious about what you mean as "today's age".
The right to choose is not at debate. Everyone who is pro-life is infinitely more in favor of choice than those who call themselves pro-choice.
The debate is only and has always been only about when, as in how far into the pregnancy.
And that is to say when does life begin. THAT's the debate, not "choice or not choice". "Pro-Choice" is nothing but a purposeful deflection of the real debate.
Having clarified that here is the reason for the deflection. It is a logical point that cannot be honestly disagreed with. The pro-choicers simply do not want to face it.
Here it is. No one knows when life begins. Religions take in on faith and science cannot even come up with a standard definition let alone a determination.
Therefore, if a woman does not know for sure if her child is alive and NO WOMAN KNOWS FOR SURE, then how can you abort when you might just be killing your baby?
It is just too perverse and disturbing to consider, unless you simply close your eyes and say the word "choice".