![]() |
|
And we need to out law guns? - Printable Version +- Red Dot Arms Forum (https://rdaforum.com) +-- Forum: Politics (https://rdaforum.com/forum-23.html) +--- Forum: Second Amendment (https://rdaforum.com/forum-24.html) +--- Thread: And we need to out law guns? (/thread-963.html) |
And we need to out law guns? - bradberry - 02-01-2015 Really?
RE: And we need to out law guns? - BelieveIn308 - 02-01-2015 Think how many democrats there would be without Abortion... If they want to reduce their numbers, I am all for it! We don't need anymore socialists or freeloaders. RE: And we need to out law guns? - rwhite135 - 02-01-2015 Most people in this country don't realize how racist of a policy the so-called "right to abortion" actually is. If you do research into the founding of Planned Parenthood it was to control the black population. Glenn Beck, when he was on Fox News, showed many videos and played audio recordings that showed just that. RE: And we need to out law guns? - bradberry - 02-01-2015 I know all about Eugenics. The first area to try to control was in Harlem RE: And we need to out law guns? - mikereddot - 02-03-2015 Planned Parenthood i was founded by http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Margaret_Sanger RE: And we need to out law guns? - bradberry - 02-03-2015 Good Ole Sanger. I am very familiar with her. I have studied and read many articles on her and eugenics. There was a great article back many years ago that told the truth according to the media, about Sanger. There was a movie that was done a while back and in the closing of the movie they actually spoke of her dirty little secret. http://www.blackgenocide.org/sanger.html RE: And we need to out law guns? - ssphoto - 02-12-2015 I would have rather saw a graphic showing the amount of gun deaths vs auto accidents and heart illness, rather than abortion. It's amazing that even in today's age this is still a debate. I myself support a woman's right to choose, as long as it's not too far into the pregnancy. RE: And we need to out law guns? - Dutz - 02-12-2015 (02-12-2015, 02:13 PM)ssphoto Wrote: It's amazing that even in today's age this is still a debate. I myself support a woman's right to choose, as long as it's not too far into the pregnancy. I am curious about what you mean as "today's age". The right to choose is not at debate. Everyone who is pro-life is infinitely more in favor of choice than those who call themselves pro-choice. The debate is only and has always been only about when, as in how far into the pregnancy. And that is to say when does life begin. THAT's the debate, not "choice or not choice". "Pro-Choice" is nothing but a purposeful deflection of the real debate. Having clarified that here is the reason for the deflection. It is a logical point that cannot be honestly disagreed with. The pro-choicers simply do not want to face it. Here it is. No one knows when life begins. Religions take in on faith and science cannot even come up with a standard definition let alone a determination. Therefore, if a woman does not know for sure if her child is alive and NO WOMAN KNOWS FOR SURE, then how can you abort when you might just be killing your baby? It is just too perverse and disturbing to consider, unless you simply close your eyes and say the word "choice". RE: And we need to out law guns? - doubleCheese - 02-12-2015 RE: And we need to out law guns? - Dutz - 02-12-2015 It really comes down to one of two paths 1. Abort the babies until we can prove they are alive 2. Don't abort the babies until we can prove they are not alive. Which would a moral and decent society choose? The answer : duh, #2 RE: And we need to out law guns? - bradberry - 02-13-2015 (02-12-2015, 06:12 PM)Dutz Wrote: It really comes down to one of two paths unless you are Margaret Sanger. RE: And we need to out law guns? - doubleCheese - 02-13-2015 I’d add a third path to the list in hope of avoiding unwanted pregnancies from the start so abortion isn’t used as a form of birth control. RE: And we need to out law guns? - XdEric - 02-13-2015 I would like the see the stats for abortions. Miscarriages are sometimes classified under abortions too... |