10-02-2015, 08:27 AM
(10-01-2015, 01:54 PM)jfergus7 Wrote: This is just ridiculous and way out of hand. Something really needs to change.
Something did change. We decided we wanted a society that had a separation of church and public places.
We erroneously concluded the "state" was all public places. Then we erroneously concluded "separation" meant removal of religious influence.
Then we decided we couldn't publicly teach the ten commandments because they were "religious".
Seriously?
Don't kill, don't steal, respect your parents, and be faithful to your wife is "religious"?
Well then, welcome to the separation of church and state. Not so pretty is it?
(10-01-2015, 01:54 PM)jfergus7 Wrote: This is just ridiculous and way out of hand. Something really needs to change.
Something did change. We decided we wanted a society that had a separation of church and public places.
We erroneously concluded the "state" was all public places. Then we erroneously concluded "separation" meant removal of religious influence.
Then we decided we couldn't publicly teach the ten commandments because they were "religious".
Seriously?
Don't kill, don't steal, respect your parents, and be faithful to your wife is "religious"?
Well then, welcome to the separation of church and state. Not so pretty is it?
Something did change. We decided we wanted a society that had a separation of church and public places.
We erroneously concluded the "state" was all public places. Then we erroneously concluded "separation" meant removal of religious influence.
Then we decided we couldn't publicly teach the ten commandments because they were "religious".
Seriously?
Don't kill, don't steal, respect your parents, and be faithful to your wife is "religious"?
Well then, welcome to the separation of church and state. Not so pretty is it?


Search
Member List
Calendar
Red Dot Arms
Help
