Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Supreme Court still disaproves of high capacity mags
12-07-2015, 06:44 PM,
#1
Thumbs Down  Supreme Court still disaproves of high capacity mags
Posts: 1,271
Threads: 966
Joined: Nov 2014
Reputation: 1
#1
Thumbs Down 
Supreme Court rejects challenge to assault weapon ban

"The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday rejected a challenge by gun rights activists to a Chicago suburb's ordinance banning assault weapons and large-capacity magazines, handing a victory to gun control advocates amid a fierce debate over the nation's firearms laws.

The 2013 ordinance passed by the city of Highland Park, Illinois will remain in place. By opting not to hear an appeal of a lower-court ruling that upheld the measure, the justices declined to take up what would have been a high-profile gun rights case following a succession of mass shootings including the one last week in San Bernardino, California..."
Supreme Court rejects challenge to assault weapon ban

"The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday rejected a challenge by gun rights activists to a Chicago suburb's ordinance banning assault weapons and large-capacity magazines, handing a victory to gun control advocates amid a fierce debate over the nation's firearms laws.

The 2013 ordinance passed by the city of Highland Park, Illinois will remain in place. By opting not to hear an appeal of a lower-court ruling that upheld the measure, the justices declined to take up what would have been a high-profile gun rights case following a succession of mass shootings including the one last week in San Bernardino, California..."
Reply
Find
Reply
12-09-2015, 09:58 AM,
#2
RE: Supreme Court still disaproves of high capacity mags
***
Posts: 2,273
Threads: 210
Joined: May 2014
Reputation: 0
#2
Another one for the good guys. The left (gun grabbers) must just hate that pesky constitution.
Reply
Find
Reply
12-15-2015, 10:05 AM,
#3
RE: Supreme Court still disaproves of high capacity mags
Posts: 12
Threads: 0
Joined: Jun 2014
Reputation: 0
#3
I'm very disappointed that the Supreme Court wouldn't take this up. They chickened out on this one and allowed a local municipality to get away with a severe Constitutional violation.
Reply
Find
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)

Contact Us | Red Dot Arms Forum | Return to Top | | Lite (Archive) Mode | RSS Syndication