02-15-2015, 10:46 PM
(02-15-2015, 10:15 PM)fromtheplaines Wrote:(it sound like a member ran over their dog and than backed over it fir good messure. )(02-10-2015, 09:10 AM)Dutz Wrote: That's too bad. I thought our discourse was rather civil for guys who carry guns.
I think the exchange of different ideas is helpful and more interesting than everyone agreeing and preaching to the choir all the time.
I assume, forgive me if I am wrong, you consider it a waste of time because you did not persuade. If so, just know real and effective persuasion rarely occurs until the persuaded has time to absorb and consider. If it does not take time and consideration the persuaded is generally just another sheep.
I don't mind debates I am just getting sick of the whole. You need to agree with me or your are not pro II. The rules in question are two separate things. The reason why I thought it was a waste of time. Is at best the points were pretty much disregarded. I know you don't like the rules. I don't like all of them either. I more or less tried to just explain the reason behind the rules to start this off. Some if the angst directed at the club makes it sound like a member ran over their dog and than backed over it fir good messure.
No not the dog but close to the dog when they run over the 2A.
that kind of thinking is how we will be force to hand in are Ar's for single bolt action rifle. Or maybe the next new gun range will be told how to run there range and what rules they have to follow. I just don't understand how you can support a range that is anti 2A that's the part I don't get but I also don't understand how Obama won his second term. So don't think it can't happen. Ask the bar owner that pays $60,000 a year in taxes why he can't smoke in his own place. You don't have to agree with anyone just don't support anti 2A.
(02-15-2015, 10:15 PM)fromtheplaines Wrote:
I don't mind debates I am just getting sick of the whole. You need to agree with me or your are not pro II. The rules in question are two separate things. The reason why I thought it was a waste of time. Is at best the points were pretty much disregarded. I know you don't like the rules. I don't like all of them either. I more or less tried to just explain the reason behind the rules to start this off. Some if the angst directed at the club makes it sound like a member ran over their dog and than backed over it fir good messure.(it sound like a member ran over their dog and than backed over it fir good messure. )
No not the dog but close to the dog when they run over the 2A.
that kind of thinking is how we will be force to hand in are Ar's for single bolt action rifle. Or maybe the next new gun range will be told how to run there range and what rules they have to follow. I just don't understand how you can support a range that is anti 2A that's the part I don't get but I also don't understand how Obama won his second term. So don't think it can't happen. Ask the bar owner that pays $60,000 a year in taxes why he can't smoke in his own place. You don't have to agree with anyone just don't support anti 2A.
(02-10-2015, 09:10 AM)Dutz Wrote: That's too bad. I thought our discourse was rather civil for guys who carry guns.
I think the exchange of different ideas is helpful and more interesting than everyone agreeing and preaching to the choir all the time.
I assume, forgive me if I am wrong, you consider it a waste of time because you did not persuade. If so, just know real and effective persuasion rarely occurs until the persuaded has time to absorb and consider. If it does not take time and consideration the persuaded is generally just another sheep.
I don't mind debates I am just getting sick of the whole. You need to agree with me or your are not pro II. The rules in question are two separate things. The reason why I thought it was a waste of time. Is at best the points were pretty much disregarded. I know you don't like the rules. I don't like all of them either. I more or less tried to just explain the reason behind the rules to start this off. Some if the angst directed at the club makes it sound like a member ran over their dog and than backed over it fir good messure.(it sound like a member ran over their dog and than backed over it fir good messure. )
No not the dog but close to the dog when they run over the 2A.
that kind of thinking is how we will be force to hand in are Ar's for single bolt action rifle. Or maybe the next new gun range will be told how to run there range and what rules they have to follow. I just don't understand how you can support a range that is anti 2A that's the part I don't get but I also don't understand how Obama won his second term. So don't think it can't happen. Ask the bar owner that pays $60,000 a year in taxes why he can't smoke in his own place. You don't have to agree with anyone just don't support anti 2A.


Search
Member List
Calendar
Red Dot Arms
Help

