Board
Search
Member List
Calendar
Red Dot Arms
Help
01-25-2015, 02:24 PM
(06-11-2014, 05:27 PM)RJDSRT Wrote:(06-11-2014, 05:23 PM)mikereddot Wrote: I would like them to have it like stats that require no training. The 16 hours of training give people a false sense of security that they have plenty of training. You can not have enough. Then, there's the question of the "pesky" 2nd amendment. If it's your right, why do you even need the permit, but I guess that will be another thread.
That's funny, I just said basically this same thing in the other thread about training
I don't feel 16 hours of training should be requiered by the state to qualify for a CCL. I agree that 16 hours is not enough for CC training. Training and practice should be an ongoing thing. CCW is not like riding a bike where once you learn you don't forget.
I may have some objections to this idea. Maybe the state could require CCW insurance just as they do for a drivers license. In turn the insurance companies can provide discount's based on hours of training and claims. I'm not only dead fast against FOID's, however in this case insurance would continue not to be required.
Everything I said is conflicting with the 2nd amendment, but then again I live in Illinois.
(06-11-2014, 05:27 PM)RJDSRT Wrote:
That's funny, I just said basically this same thing in the other thread about training
I don't feel 16 hours of training should be requiered by the state to qualify for a CCL. I agree that 16 hours is not enough for CC training. Training and practice should be an ongoing thing. CCW is not like riding a bike where once you learn you don't forget.
I may have some objections to this idea. Maybe the state could require CCW insurance just as they do for a drivers license. In turn the insurance companies can provide discount's based on hours of training and claims. I'm not only dead fast against FOID's, however in this case insurance would continue not to be required.
Everything I said is conflicting with the 2nd amendment, but then again I live in Illinois.
(06-11-2014, 05:23 PM)mikereddot Wrote: I would like them to have it like stats that require no training. The 16 hours of training give people a false sense of security that they have plenty of training. You can not have enough. Then, there's the question of the "pesky" 2nd amendment. If it's your right, why do you even need the permit, but I guess that will be another thread.
That's funny, I just said basically this same thing in the other thread about training
I don't feel 16 hours of training should be requiered by the state to qualify for a CCL. I agree that 16 hours is not enough for CC training. Training and practice should be an ongoing thing. CCW is not like riding a bike where once you learn you don't forget.
I may have some objections to this idea. Maybe the state could require CCW insurance just as they do for a drivers license. In turn the insurance companies can provide discount's based on hours of training and claims. I'm not only dead fast against FOID's, however in this case insurance would continue not to be required.
Everything I said is conflicting with the 2nd amendment, but then again I live in Illinois.