Board
Search
Member List
Calendar
Red Dot Arms
Help
11-10-2017, 09:44 AM
(11-08-2017, 03:03 PM)rwhite135 Wrote: The governors wouldn't have any say in it because it would be federal law. The whole point of the bill is to stop states infringing on the rights of visitors to those states.
As I see it, before it becomes a bill, indirectly the Gov's would have their influence in this bill. By the use of their party contacts, their own state representatives, and or their federal representative.
One way or another influence from the state Gov's (or other state contact) would and could affect such a bill.
(11-08-2017, 03:03 PM)rwhite135 Wrote: The governors wouldn't have any say in it because it would be federal law. The whole point of the bill is to stop states infringing on the rights of visitors to those states.
As I see it, before it becomes a bill, indirectly the Gov's would have their influence in this bill. By the use of their party contacts, their own state representatives, and or their federal representative.
One way or another influence from the state Gov's (or other state contact) would and could affect such a bill.
As I see it, before it becomes a bill, indirectly the Gov's would have their influence in this bill. By the use of their party contacts, their own state representatives, and or their federal representative.
One way or another influence from the state Gov's (or other state contact) would and could affect such a bill.