03-02-2016, 12:18 PM
(03-02-2016, 11:24 AM)ssphoto Wrote: To me this is an example of religion interfering in purely governmental affairs. Separation! So, if we can't show the most recognizable part of the human body, the face, then do we look for birthmarks? I bet that would roll over pretty nice!
I personally think this shouldn't even be a religious issue. If you are obstructing your face in any way, then what is the use of the picture? It should go for any religion. It is on there for a reason.
(03-02-2016, 11:24 AM)ssphoto Wrote: To me this is an example of religion interfering in purely governmental affairs. Separation! So, if we can't show the most recognizable part of the human body, the face, then do we look for birthmarks? I bet that would roll over pretty nice!
I personally think this shouldn't even be a religious issue. If you are obstructing your face in any way, then what is the use of the picture? It should go for any religion. It is on there for a reason.
I personally think this shouldn't even be a religious issue. If you are obstructing your face in any way, then what is the use of the picture? It should go for any religion. It is on there for a reason.


Search
Member List
Calendar
Red Dot Arms
Help