12-02-2015, 02:16 PM
(12-02-2015, 12:08 PM)fromtheplaines Wrote: So basically the only way to avoid socialism is to let the country sit around. until an undetermined amount if people make a choice, and hopefully it's within the tolerances of the group to make any changes. How would you handle things that people would have no interest in anyways, to get a organic majority opinion? And are advocating this on a national level? Or at a state or local?
You are now asking me for specifics to address your broad strokes.
"Help the environment", "Fix the environment", "Focus on the environment", "Save the environment", "focus on new sources of energy"
All of those are meaningless statements. Give me a specific and I'll give a response.
Let's take new sources of energy. Is this "focus" we are talking about the giving of 1/2 billion dollars to Obama's corrupt friends at Solyndra, so they can declare bankruptcy and pocket the money?
Because that is the kind of "focus" the federal government will provide.
(12-02-2015, 12:08 PM)fromtheplaines Wrote: So basically the only way to avoid socialism is to let the country sit around. until an undetermined amount if people make a choice, and hopefully it's within the tolerances of the group to make any changes. How would you handle things that people would have no interest in anyways, to get a organic majority opinion? And are advocating this on a national level? Or at a state or local?
You are now asking me for specifics to address your broad strokes.
"Help the environment", "Fix the environment", "Focus on the environment", "Save the environment", "focus on new sources of energy"
All of those are meaningless statements. Give me a specific and I'll give a response.
Let's take new sources of energy. Is this "focus" we are talking about the giving of 1/2 billion dollars to Obama's corrupt friends at Solyndra, so they can declare bankruptcy and pocket the money?
Because that is the kind of "focus" the federal government will provide.
You are now asking me for specifics to address your broad strokes.
"Help the environment", "Fix the environment", "Focus on the environment", "Save the environment", "focus on new sources of energy"
All of those are meaningless statements. Give me a specific and I'll give a response.
Let's take new sources of energy. Is this "focus" we are talking about the giving of 1/2 billion dollars to Obama's corrupt friends at Solyndra, so they can declare bankruptcy and pocket the money?
Because that is the kind of "focus" the federal government will provide.


Search
Member List
Calendar
Red Dot Arms
Help
