Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Caliber Debate
09-04-2015, 03:10 PM,
#4
RE: Caliber Debate
***
Posts: 2,216
Threads: 124
Joined: Jun 2014
Reputation: 8
#4
Dutz, kind of my view too... Military service weapons in a fire fight might not be a very good indicator either as they are using ball ammo. The 9mm (Nato or +P) 124 grain is considered not up to the job by the military. I think 9mm JHP are however a good round, not as good as a .45 ACP JHP, but a good round. With CCW, I carry either a LC9S (7+1) or a FNS 9mm (17+1). If it were a combat weapon, I am carrying .45 ACP. In a combat situation, if you have to use a sidearm, you have probably made a really serious judgement error, and if you survive, you need to re-evaluate your choices.
"An unarmed man can only flee from evil, and evil is not overcome by fleeing from it." -Col. Jeff Cooper
"An unarmed man can only flee from evil, and evil is not overcome by fleeing from it." -Col. Jeff Cooper
Reply
Find
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Caliber Debate - by Dutz - 09-04-2015, 06:51 AM
RE: Caliber Debate - by BelieveIn308 - 09-04-2015, 07:16 AM
RE: Caliber Debate - by Dutz - 09-04-2015, 08:41 AM
RE: Caliber Debate - by BelieveIn308 - 09-04-2015, 03:10 PM
RE: Caliber Debate - by Karl B - 09-16-2015, 10:49 PM
RE: Caliber Debate - by British Gunner - 09-17-2015, 03:06 PM
RE: Caliber Debate - by rwhite135 - 09-18-2015, 07:51 PM
RE: Caliber Debate - by Ringo3632 - 09-19-2015, 07:13 PM
RE: Caliber Debate - by rwhite135 - 09-20-2015, 06:06 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)

Contact Us | Red Dot Arms Forum | Return to Top | | Lite (Archive) Mode | RSS Syndication