Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2nd to cover Illegals?
09-01-2015, 12:01 PM,
#2
RE: 2nd to cover Illegals?
***
Posts: 2,216
Threads: 124
Joined: Jun 2014
Reputation: 8
#2
Non-Citizens should not have the same rights as citizens, PERIOD. Anyone in our territory is subject to U.S. Law (Federal, State and Local).

I do not know where this idea surfaces that non-citizens have Constitutional rights. The founding fathers were clear about this in the Federalist papers debates.
"An unarmed man can only flee from evil, and evil is not overcome by fleeing from it." -Col. Jeff Cooper

I do not know where this idea surfaces that non-citizens have Constitutional rights. The founding fathers were clear about this in the Federalist papers debates.
"An unarmed man can only flee from evil, and evil is not overcome by fleeing from it." -Col. Jeff Cooper
Reply
Find
Reply


Messages In This Thread
2nd to cover Illegals? - by bradberry - 09-01-2015, 10:29 AM
RE: 2nd to cover Illegals? - by BelieveIn308 - 09-01-2015, 12:01 PM
RE: 2nd to cover Illegals? - by ssphoto - 09-01-2015, 04:14 PM
RE: 2nd to cover Illegals? - by Dutz - 09-02-2015, 06:53 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)

Contact Us | Red Dot Arms Forum | Return to Top | | Lite (Archive) Mode | RSS Syndication