Board
Search
Member List
Calendar
Red Dot Arms
Help
08-07-2015, 05:52 PM
I though Paul handled the 4th amendment correctly. A warrant MUST spell out a person of persons. Christie showed he is ignorant on the matter by wanting 'blanket' warrants. This right was included in the Bill of Rights precisely because the English crown would grant Soldiers 'blanket' warrants, specifying entire cities and in some cases states. Paul was only guilty of acting to much like a lawyer. Christie is the clueless one on the process. This is why the SCOTUS ordered Obama to stop storing all phone records and conversations.
Christie response was, like Obama's it's OK to ignore the Constitution and grant the state super police powers.
Christie response was, like Obama's it's OK to ignore the Constitution and grant the state super police powers.
"An unarmed man can only flee from evil, and evil is not overcome by fleeing from it." -Col. Jeff Cooper
Christie response was, like Obama's it's OK to ignore the Constitution and grant the state super police powers.