I watched the debate and here are some of my observations.
Trump: The most interesting part was people in the focus group after the show who said they came in supporting him and now don't. Trump said nothing he hasn't said before and in the same way he says everything. This means they supported him without ever listening to him. If that is common then his support is as weak as people think. Someone before the debate said his support is a big middle finger at the republican leadership. Probably true.
Rubio: Was and is always the most inspiring speaker- a little Reaganlike in that respect. I think, though, he is still a few grey hairs short of being ready.
Walker: Played the only card he has. He won three elections and did some good things (and what he said he would do) as governor and can do the same as president. If he can get people to believe then he can win, if true he could be a good president.
Bush: The debate didn't change anything. He is what he is - a moderate, a good guy, a solid governor. He would be like hiring a coach to take over a championship team. He won't do anything great, but he won't screw it up. Not what we need right now.
Huckabee: Very poised and said a lot of good things. We agree on a lot. Unfortunately, I don't get the sense he knows what he will actually do about those things.
(Rand) Paul: Looked like the middle child trying to get daddy's attention. As a true libertarian you would think he would tap into the nation's mood right now and be on top. Just doesn't seem to be happening.
Carson: I like him and how he presents himself. If I needed half my brain removed he'd be the man (inside joke from the debate), but I am just not getting a "ready for prime time" feel. If you want a "never been a politician" then there are better choices, even in this group.
Kasich: Who? Governor of Ohio, oh yeah. Nice guy. Next.
Fiorina: I didn't watch the first debate, but I will comment. 85% of the people polled said she kicked the entire first group's collective butt, this included Jindal and Perry. Dont' underestimate this woman. If it came down to Hillary and Fiorina, it would be no contest.
Christie: Since we don't agree on a lot I hate to say it, but dang I liked how he looked. He was confrontational in a good way and came across like he knew exactly what we wants to do, exactly how to do it, and he wasn't going to be stopped. I love all that. Bummer that I probably won't agree with what he will do. Of all the "young guns" (Jindal, Rubio, etc.) he looked the most ready.
Cruz: I saved him for last on purpose. I think the country is passed the point of no return, and the Republicans should die and be replaced like the Republicans replaced the Whigs. But if there is any hope of saving either this is the only one running in either party who could make a difference. If you are looking for the next Reagan, this is your only shot. Rubio shows signs but is not ready.
As of right now, I think I can say I support Cruz.
Trump: The most interesting part was people in the focus group after the show who said they came in supporting him and now don't. Trump said nothing he hasn't said before and in the same way he says everything. This means they supported him without ever listening to him. If that is common then his support is as weak as people think. Someone before the debate said his support is a big middle finger at the republican leadership. Probably true.
Rubio: Was and is always the most inspiring speaker- a little Reaganlike in that respect. I think, though, he is still a few grey hairs short of being ready.
Walker: Played the only card he has. He won three elections and did some good things (and what he said he would do) as governor and can do the same as president. If he can get people to believe then he can win, if true he could be a good president.
Bush: The debate didn't change anything. He is what he is - a moderate, a good guy, a solid governor. He would be like hiring a coach to take over a championship team. He won't do anything great, but he won't screw it up. Not what we need right now.
Huckabee: Very poised and said a lot of good things. We agree on a lot. Unfortunately, I don't get the sense he knows what he will actually do about those things.
(Rand) Paul: Looked like the middle child trying to get daddy's attention. As a true libertarian you would think he would tap into the nation's mood right now and be on top. Just doesn't seem to be happening.
Carson: I like him and how he presents himself. If I needed half my brain removed he'd be the man (inside joke from the debate), but I am just not getting a "ready for prime time" feel. If you want a "never been a politician" then there are better choices, even in this group.
Kasich: Who? Governor of Ohio, oh yeah. Nice guy. Next.
Fiorina: I didn't watch the first debate, but I will comment. 85% of the people polled said she kicked the entire first group's collective butt, this included Jindal and Perry. Dont' underestimate this woman. If it came down to Hillary and Fiorina, it would be no contest.
Christie: Since we don't agree on a lot I hate to say it, but dang I liked how he looked. He was confrontational in a good way and came across like he knew exactly what we wants to do, exactly how to do it, and he wasn't going to be stopped. I love all that. Bummer that I probably won't agree with what he will do. Of all the "young guns" (Jindal, Rubio, etc.) he looked the most ready.
Cruz: I saved him for last on purpose. I think the country is passed the point of no return, and the Republicans should die and be replaced like the Republicans replaced the Whigs. But if there is any hope of saving either this is the only one running in either party who could make a difference. If you are looking for the next Reagan, this is your only shot. Rubio shows signs but is not ready.
As of right now, I think I can say I support Cruz.
Trump: The most interesting part was people in the focus group after the show who said they came in supporting him and now don't. Trump said nothing he hasn't said before and in the same way he says everything. This means they supported him without ever listening to him. If that is common then his support is as weak as people think. Someone before the debate said his support is a big middle finger at the republican leadership. Probably true.
Rubio: Was and is always the most inspiring speaker- a little Reaganlike in that respect. I think, though, he is still a few grey hairs short of being ready.
Walker: Played the only card he has. He won three elections and did some good things (and what he said he would do) as governor and can do the same as president. If he can get people to believe then he can win, if true he could be a good president.
Bush: The debate didn't change anything. He is what he is - a moderate, a good guy, a solid governor. He would be like hiring a coach to take over a championship team. He won't do anything great, but he won't screw it up. Not what we need right now.
Huckabee: Very poised and said a lot of good things. We agree on a lot. Unfortunately, I don't get the sense he knows what he will actually do about those things.
(Rand) Paul: Looked like the middle child trying to get daddy's attention. As a true libertarian you would think he would tap into the nation's mood right now and be on top. Just doesn't seem to be happening.
Carson: I like him and how he presents himself. If I needed half my brain removed he'd be the man (inside joke from the debate), but I am just not getting a "ready for prime time" feel. If you want a "never been a politician" then there are better choices, even in this group.
Kasich: Who? Governor of Ohio, oh yeah. Nice guy. Next.
Fiorina: I didn't watch the first debate, but I will comment. 85% of the people polled said she kicked the entire first group's collective butt, this included Jindal and Perry. Dont' underestimate this woman. If it came down to Hillary and Fiorina, it would be no contest.
Christie: Since we don't agree on a lot I hate to say it, but dang I liked how he looked. He was confrontational in a good way and came across like he knew exactly what we wants to do, exactly how to do it, and he wasn't going to be stopped. I love all that. Bummer that I probably won't agree with what he will do. Of all the "young guns" (Jindal, Rubio, etc.) he looked the most ready.
Cruz: I saved him for last on purpose. I think the country is passed the point of no return, and the Republicans should die and be replaced like the Republicans replaced the Whigs. But if there is any hope of saving either this is the only one running in either party who could make a difference. If you are looking for the next Reagan, this is your only shot. Rubio shows signs but is not ready.
As of right now, I think I can say I support Cruz.


Search
Member List
Calendar
Red Dot Arms
Help
