Board
Search
Member List
Calendar
Red Dot Arms
Help
04-07-2015, 12:01 AM
(04-04-2015, 10:40 PM)RJDSRT Wrote:(04-03-2015, 07:21 PM)mikereddot Wrote:(04-02-2015, 02:25 PM)RJDSRT Wrote:(03-24-2015, 06:04 PM)XdEric Wrote: Im not impress. It has already been done by Springfield for about 3 years now. Little late to the game guys.
*Intrac*.... Has been done by the Croatian company *intrac*. Springfield just rolls their name on the gun. Considering that Glock was making these polymer frame guns long before Springfield bought the contract with Intrac to claim their product, who is REALLY late to the game? ;) lmao... Springfield showed up to the wrong stadium!! Lol.
DUDE!!!! Having said that, you should be driving a Ford instead of a Jeep since they were in the automotive business 40 earlier.
Not quite. I'm not getting on a Ford thread and bashing them because my Jeep is so "far superior"...! I dont understand why Intrac owners get on the glock threads to bash them every chance they can. It's as though they are compensating for their crappy guns by bashing the other. I just like to point out the intrac's crappiness when folks get to slamming the Glocks. Glocks are not the best in the world, nor are "Springfields". I have an FN five-seven strapped to my hip as I'm typing this, but I don't get on the springfield thread to say how much better my FN's are.
Food for thought...
Cause they are what they are.
(04-04-2015, 10:40 PM)RJDSRT Wrote:
Not quite. I'm not getting on a Ford thread and bashing them because my Jeep is so "far superior"...! I dont understand why Intrac owners get on the glock threads to bash them every chance they can. It's as though they are compensating for their crappy guns by bashing the other. I just like to point out the intrac's crappiness when folks get to slamming the Glocks. Glocks are not the best in the world, nor are "Springfields". I have an FN five-seven strapped to my hip as I'm typing this, but I don't get on the springfield thread to say how much better my FN's are.
Food for thought...
Cause they are what they are.
(04-03-2015, 07:21 PM)mikereddot Wrote:(04-02-2015, 02:25 PM)RJDSRT Wrote:(03-24-2015, 06:04 PM)XdEric Wrote: Im not impress. It has already been done by Springfield for about 3 years now. Little late to the game guys.
*Intrac*.... Has been done by the Croatian company *intrac*. Springfield just rolls their name on the gun. Considering that Glock was making these polymer frame guns long before Springfield bought the contract with Intrac to claim their product, who is REALLY late to the game? ;) lmao... Springfield showed up to the wrong stadium!! Lol.
DUDE!!!! Having said that, you should be driving a Ford instead of a Jeep since they were in the automotive business 40 earlier.
Not quite. I'm not getting on a Ford thread and bashing them because my Jeep is so "far superior"...! I dont understand why Intrac owners get on the glock threads to bash them every chance they can. It's as though they are compensating for their crappy guns by bashing the other. I just like to point out the intrac's crappiness when folks get to slamming the Glocks. Glocks are not the best in the world, nor are "Springfields". I have an FN five-seven strapped to my hip as I'm typing this, but I don't get on the springfield thread to say how much better my FN's are.
Food for thought...
Cause they are what they are.