Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
And we need to out law guns?
02-01-2015, 03:17 PM,
#1
And we need to out law guns?
***
Posts: 2,382
Threads: 376
Joined: Dec 2014
Reputation: 1
#1
Really?[Image: abortion1.jpg]
Reply
Find
Reply
02-01-2015, 03:19 PM,
#2
RE: And we need to out law guns?
***
Posts: 2,216
Threads: 124
Joined: Jun 2014
Reputation: 8
#2
Think how many democrats there would be without Abortion... If they want to reduce their numbers, I am all for it! We don't need anymore socialists or freeloaders.
"An unarmed man can only flee from evil, and evil is not overcome by fleeing from it." -Col. Jeff Cooper
"An unarmed man can only flee from evil, and evil is not overcome by fleeing from it." -Col. Jeff Cooper
Reply
Find
Reply
02-01-2015, 06:07 PM, (This post was last modified: 02-01-2015, 06:12 PM by rwhite135.)
#3
RE: And we need to out law guns?
**
Posts: 607
Threads: 35
Joined: Jan 2015
Reputation: 0
#3
Most people in this country don't realize how racist of a policy the so-called "right to abortion" actually is. If you do research into the founding of Planned Parenthood it was to control the black population. Glenn Beck, when he was on Fox News, showed many videos and played audio recordings that showed just that.
Reply
Find
Reply
02-01-2015, 06:36 PM,
#4
RE: And we need to out law guns?
***
Posts: 2,382
Threads: 376
Joined: Dec 2014
Reputation: 1
#4
I know all about Eugenics. The first area to try to control was in Harlem
Reply
Find
Reply
02-03-2015, 11:33 AM,
#5
RE: And we need to out law guns?
***
Posts: 2,268
Threads: 207
Joined: May 2014
Reputation: 0
#5
Planned Parenthood i was founded by

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Margaret_Sanger




Reply
Find
Reply
02-03-2015, 11:48 AM,
#6
RE: And we need to out law guns?
***
Posts: 2,382
Threads: 376
Joined: Dec 2014
Reputation: 1
#6
Good Ole Sanger. I am very familiar with her. I have studied and read many articles on her and eugenics. There was a great article back many years ago that told the truth according to the media, about Sanger. There was a movie that was done a while back and in the closing of the movie they actually spoke of her dirty little secret.

http://www.blackgenocide.org/sanger.html
Reply
Find
Reply
02-12-2015, 02:13 PM,
#7
RE: And we need to out law guns?
***
Posts: 794
Threads: 142
Joined: Jun 2014
Reputation: 0
#7
I would have rather saw a graphic showing the amount of gun deaths vs auto accidents and heart illness, rather than abortion. It's amazing that even in today's age this is still a debate. I myself support a woman's right to choose, as long as it's not too far into the pregnancy.
Reply
Find
Reply
02-12-2015, 03:54 PM, (This post was last modified: 02-12-2015, 06:15 PM by Dutz.)
#8
RE: And we need to out law guns?
***
Posts: 1,393
Threads: 79
Joined: Jul 2014
Reputation: 2
#8
(02-12-2015, 02:13 PM)ssphoto Wrote: It's amazing that even in today's age this is still a debate. I myself support a woman's right to choose, as long as it's not too far into the pregnancy.

I am curious about what you mean as "today's age".

The right to choose is not at debate. Everyone who is pro-life is infinitely more in favor of choice than those who call themselves pro-choice.

The debate is only and has always been only about when, as in how far into the pregnancy.

And that is to say when does life begin. THAT's the debate, not "choice or not choice". "Pro-Choice" is nothing but a purposeful deflection of the real debate.

Having clarified that here is the reason for the deflection. It is a logical point that cannot be honestly disagreed with. The pro-choicers simply do not want to face it.

Here it is. No one knows when life begins. Religions take in on faith and science cannot even come up with a standard definition let alone a determination.

Therefore, if a woman does not know for sure if her child is alive and NO WOMAN KNOWS FOR SURE, then how can you abort when you might just be killing your baby?

It is just too perverse and disturbing to consider, unless you simply close your eyes and say the word "choice".
(02-12-2015, 02:13 PM)ssphoto Wrote: It's amazing that even in today's age this is still a debate. I myself support a woman's right to choose, as long as it's not too far into the pregnancy.
I am curious about what you mean as "today's age".

The right to choose is not at debate. Everyone who is pro-life is infinitely more in favor of choice than those who call themselves pro-choice.

The debate is only and has always been only about when, as in how far into the pregnancy.

And that is to say when does life begin. THAT's the debate, not "choice or not choice". "Pro-Choice" is nothing but a purposeful deflection of the real debate.

Having clarified that here is the reason for the deflection. It is a logical point that cannot be honestly disagreed with. The pro-choicers simply do not want to face it.

Here it is. No one knows when life begins. Religions take in on faith and science cannot even come up with a standard definition let alone a determination.

Therefore, if a woman does not know for sure if her child is alive and NO WOMAN KNOWS FOR SURE, then how can you abort when you might just be killing your baby?

It is just too perverse and disturbing to consider, unless you simply close your eyes and say the word "choice".
Reply
Find
Reply
02-12-2015, 05:29 PM,
#9
RE: And we need to out law guns?
Posts: 35
Threads: 4
Joined: Jan 2015
Reputation: 0
#9
Reply
Find
Reply
02-12-2015, 06:12 PM, (This post was last modified: 02-12-2015, 06:13 PM by Dutz.)
#10
RE: And we need to out law guns?
***
Posts: 1,393
Threads: 79
Joined: Jul 2014
Reputation: 2
#10
It really comes down to one of two paths

1. Abort the babies until we can prove they are alive

2. Don't abort the babies until we can prove they are not alive.

Which would a moral and decent society choose?

The answer : duh, #2

1. Abort the babies until we can prove they are alive

2. Don't abort the babies until we can prove they are not alive.

Which would a moral and decent society choose?

The answer : duh, #2
Reply
Find
Reply
02-13-2015, 09:44 AM,
#11
RE: And we need to out law guns?
***
Posts: 2,382
Threads: 376
Joined: Dec 2014
Reputation: 1
#11
(02-12-2015, 06:12 PM)Dutz Wrote: It really comes down to one of two paths

1. Abort the babies until we can prove they are alive

2. Don't abort the babies until we can prove they are not alive.

Which would a moral and decent society choose?

The answer : duh, #2

unless you are Margaret Sanger.
(02-12-2015, 06:12 PM)Dutz Wrote: It really comes down to one of two paths

1. Abort the babies until we can prove they are alive

2. Don't abort the babies until we can prove they are not alive.

Which would a moral and decent society choose?

The answer : duh, #2
unless you are Margaret Sanger.
Reply
Find
Reply
02-13-2015, 10:21 AM,
#12
RE: And we need to out law guns?
Posts: 35
Threads: 4
Joined: Jan 2015
Reputation: 0
#12
I’d add a third path to the list in hope of avoiding unwanted pregnancies from the start so abortion isn’t used as a form of birth control.
Reply
Find
Reply
02-13-2015, 12:58 PM,
#13
RE: And we need to out law guns?
Posts: 280
Threads: 35
Joined: Dec 2014
Reputation: 0
#13
I would like the see the stats for abortions. Miscarriages are sometimes classified under abortions too...
[Image: ericsign.jpg]
[Image: ericsign.jpg]
Reply
Find
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)

Contact Us | Red Dot Arms Forum | Return to Top | | Lite (Archive) Mode | RSS Syndication