Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
YES PLEASE
06-14-2014, 11:40 PM,
#1
Wink  YES PLEASE
Ill take one!....or five...Glock 18 youtube video
Big GrinBig GrinBig GrinBig GrinBig GrinBig GrinBig GrinBig Grin
Its a shame these aren't easier to get Undecided
"Gun control is like trying to reduce drunk driving by making it tougher for sober people to own cars."

[Image: ARRED.png]
Reply
06-15-2014, 08:48 PM,
#2
RE: YES PLEASE
sad but i undertand. There are 2 many idiots out there. Society needs to WAKE UP.
Reply
06-21-2014, 12:32 PM,
#3
RE: YES PLEASE
I can't think what Senator Feinstein would say watching this video. Big Grin
Reply
07-26-2014, 06:09 AM,
#4
RE: YES PLEASE
Can we even own Class III in Illinois? I thought they were all banned?

Huh
Reply
07-27-2014, 07:03 PM,
#5
RE: YES PLEASE
I would love to try to shoot that puppy.
Reply
07-27-2014, 07:47 PM,
#6
RE: YES PLEASE
(07-26-2014, 06:09 AM)BelieveIn308 Wrote: Can we even own Class III in Illinois? I thought they were all banned?

Huh

Dodgy nope not here
"Gun control is like trying to reduce drunk driving by making it tougher for sober people to own cars."

[Image: ARRED.png]
Reply
07-31-2014, 07:36 AM,
#7
RE: YES PLEASE
(07-27-2014, 07:47 PM)RJDSRT Wrote:
(07-26-2014, 06:09 AM)BelieveIn308 Wrote: Can we even own Class III in Illinois? I thought they were all banned?

Huh

Dodgy nope not here

Probably just as well, I don't think I could afford the ammo... I can barely afford my shooting addiction now.
Reply
09-24-2014, 06:20 PM,
#8
RE: YES PLEASE
That would be amazing to give a good run or two. But I have to admit I don't think I could afford the ammo at all either!

I'd still take one though if it was allowed...
Reply
09-24-2014, 09:03 PM,
#9
RE: YES PLEASE
(07-31-2014, 07:36 AM)BelieveIn308 Wrote:
(07-27-2014, 07:47 PM)RJDSRT Wrote:
(07-26-2014, 06:09 AM)BelieveIn308 Wrote: Can we even own Class III in Illinois? I thought they were all banned?

Huh

Dodgy nope not here

Probably just as well, I don't think I could afford the ammo... I can barely afford my shooting addiction now.

I'm right there with ya
Reply
10-03-2014, 01:59 PM,
#10
RE: YES PLEASE
Sometimes you just have to hate the People's Republic of Illinois... How dare they protect me from needing a second mortgage to support my shooting addiction.
Reply
10-03-2014, 02:03 PM,
#11
RE: YES PLEASE
Damn them!! Big Grin
"Gun control is like trying to reduce drunk driving by making it tougher for sober people to own cars."

[Image: ARRED.png]
Reply
10-03-2014, 03:06 PM,
#12
RE: YES PLEASE
(10-03-2014, 01:59 PM)BelieveIn308 Wrote: Sometimes you just have to hate the People's Republic of Illinois... How dare they protect me from needing a second mortgage to support my shooting addiction.

Funny!
Reply
10-29-2014, 01:14 AM,
#13
RE: YES PLEASE
Illinois ...Tear that wall down
Click Here ~~~~>Glock Often Imitated....Never Duplicated
Reply
10-29-2014, 10:20 AM,
#14
RE: YES PLEASE
That thing is just awesome! I want one. To bad I can't purchase it using my Wisconsin summer home address.
Reply
10-29-2014, 06:12 PM, (This post was last modified: 10-29-2014, 06:13 PM by Brian S.)
#15
RE: YES PLEASE
I just happened to watch the movie "The Hurt Locker" the other day. There's a scene in it where a Barrett M82xx is used to take out a few taliban snipers.... very cool
Click Here ~~~~>Glock Often Imitated....Never Duplicated
Reply
10-29-2014, 08:09 PM,
#16
RE: YES PLEASE
(07-26-2014, 06:09 AM)BelieveIn308 Wrote: Can we even own Class III in Illinois? I thought they were all banned?

Huh

Another great thing about Wisconsin. Nothing like hearing a full auto UZI cracking off 3 mags in a row. Thumbs up
Reply
07-02-2015, 08:34 AM,
#17
RE: YES PLEASE
Do you think that now with the recent SCOTUS ruling that States have to recognize licenses issued by other states, that this will nullify Illinois laws and force Illinois to recognize Silencers and Full Automatic weapons licenses issued by the ATF? Afterall, the Federal license should nullify laws in Illinois against them...
"An unarmed man can only flee from evil, and evil is not overcome by fleeing from it." -Col. Jeff Cooper
Reply
07-04-2015, 10:41 AM,
#18
RE: YES PLEASE
(07-02-2015, 08:34 AM)BelieveIn308 Wrote: Do you think that now with the recent SCOTUS ruling that States have to recognize licenses issued by other states, that this will nullify Illinois laws and force Illinois to recognize Silencers and Full Automatic weapons licenses issued by the ATF? Afterall, the Federal license should nullify laws in Illinois against them...

It should, but it won't.
Reply
07-05-2015, 08:42 AM,
#19
YES PLEASE
(07-02-2015, 08:34 AM)BelieveIn308 Wrote: Do you think that now with the recent SCOTUS ruling that States have to recognize licenses issued by other states, that this will nullify Illinois laws and force Illinois to recognize Silencers and Full Automatic weapons licenses issued by the ATF? Afterall, the Federal license should nullify laws in Illinois against them...

Similar to POTUS, Cook County approves laws showing what local government will do to fight Federal laws by banning particular weapons that are only a fraction of a percent used or owned illegally.....not registered, no FOID, gang violence. I'll add the most well known sporting .22 rifles are a of these bans. I think we all agree laws that were in place prior to the more recent ones in NE Illinois should be enforced rather than punishing the sportsman, competitor or any other law abiding American citizen.
Click Here ~~~~>Glock Often Imitated....Never Duplicated
Reply
07-05-2015, 11:33 AM,
#20
RE: YES PLEASE
(07-05-2015, 08:42 AM)Brian S Wrote:
(07-02-2015, 08:34 AM)BelieveIn308 Wrote: Do you think that now with the recent SCOTUS ruling that States have to recognize licenses issued by other states, that this will nullify Illinois laws and force Illinois to recognize Silencers and Full Automatic weapons licenses issued by the ATF? Afterall, the Federal license should nullify laws in Illinois against them...

Similar to POTUS, Cook County approves laws showing what local government will do to fight Federal laws by banning particular weapons that are only a fraction of a percent used or owned illegally.....not registered, no FOID, gang violence. I'll add the most well known sporting .22 rifles are a of these bans. I think we all agree laws that were in place prior to the more recent ones in NE Illinois should be enforced rather than punishing the sportsman, competitor or any other law abiding American citizen.

I think all guns laws should be removed, and replaced with one. Commit a crime with a gun, and we triple the sentence of the original crime without the gun. (Triple is an example) Then stick to these sentence.

In Illinois, I can sport a samurai sword on my back, and that's is legal. I'll get funny looks, but it's not against the law. I take my 3 inch Hoffner out of my pocket and use is as a for a crime, then that becomes a weapon, and that is illegal. To me that makes sense.
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)

Contact Us | Red Dot Arms Forum | Return to Top | | Lite (Archive) Mode | RSS Syndication