Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Revolver Question
07-21-2015, 10:52 AM,
#21
RE: Revolver Question
***
Posts: 1,110
Threads: 82
Joined: Sep 2014
Reputation: 3
#21
It's been so long I don't remember what my Buck Mark dislikes
Reply
Find
Reply
07-21-2015, 08:47 PM,
#22
RE: Revolver Question
***
Posts: 2,268
Threads: 207
Joined: May 2014
Reputation: 0
#22
my Buckmark hates the loose 500 packs of thunderbolts.
Reply
Find
Reply
07-27-2015, 02:57 PM,
#23
RE: Revolver Question
Posts: 5
Threads: 0
Joined: Jun 2015
Reputation: 0
#23
(07-21-2015, 10:32 AM)BelieveIn308 Wrote:
(07-20-2015, 10:43 PM)AcilletaM Wrote:
(07-20-2015, 02:45 PM)BelieveIn308 Wrote: Plus I heard a rumor Ruger was going to release a new SR22 striker fired pistol...

I know there are a couple out there like the Beretta Neos but I didn't think .22lr worked very well as striker fired because of the QC issues with the mass produced ammo. Most have internal hammers. Maybe Ruger is just making the hammer internal?

We shall see... If Ruger does come out with one, I am sure they will have the kinks worked out so it is reliable. So far I have not seen anything new on the rumor. I'd probably wait awhile to see what reviewers think. Heck, there is enough 22LR ammo that is problematic. I have a couple 22LR pistols, a S&W22A and a Ruger MkIII, both are really good shooters, and both seem ammo tolerant. But I have a friend that has a Buckmark, and it hates the Winchester White Box stuff... Maybe I just need to add a SR22 to my want list...
It would be neat to see how a ruger 22lr would stack up against a Beretta. I have shot a Beretta neos it is a very ammo tolerate with almost no problems. My only question is with 22lr hard to find doesn't this seem to be a waist of ruger time?
(07-21-2015, 10:32 AM)BelieveIn308 Wrote:
(07-20-2015, 10:43 PM)AcilletaM Wrote:
(07-20-2015, 02:45 PM)BelieveIn308 Wrote: Plus I heard a rumor Ruger was going to release a new SR22 striker fired pistol...

I know there are a couple out there like the Beretta Neos but I didn't think .22lr worked very well as striker fired because of the QC issues with the mass produced ammo. Most have internal hammers. Maybe Ruger is just making the hammer internal?

We shall see... If Ruger does come out with one, I am sure they will have the kinks worked out so it is reliable. So far I have not seen anything new on the rumor. I'd probably wait awhile to see what reviewers think. Heck, there is enough 22LR ammo that is problematic. I have a couple 22LR pistols, a S&W22A and a Ruger MkIII, both are really good shooters, and both seem ammo tolerant. But I have a friend that has a Buckmark, and it hates the Winchester White Box stuff... Maybe I just need to add a SR22 to my want list...It would be neat to see how a ruger 22lr would stack up against a Beretta. I have shot a Beretta neos it is a very ammo tolerate with almost no problems. My only question is with 22lr hard to find doesn't this seem to be a waist of ruger time?
Reply
Find
Reply
07-27-2015, 02:59 PM,
#24
RE: Revolver Question
Posts: 5
Threads: 0
Joined: Jun 2015
Reputation: 0
#24
@ OP Great shooting!
have you shot 45colt before?
if so how does the beating compare?
i have never shot a .44.
have you shot 45colt before?
if so how does the beating compare?
i have never shot a .44.
Reply
Find
Reply
07-27-2015, 04:25 PM,
#25
RE: Revolver Question
***
Posts: 2,216
Threads: 124
Joined: Jun 2014
Reputation: 8
#25
I think the beating is more gun dependent. IMHO the 45 colt has way less kick that a .44 magnum.
"An unarmed man can only flee from evil, and evil is not overcome by fleeing from it." -Col. Jeff Cooper
"An unarmed man can only flee from evil, and evil is not overcome by fleeing from it." -Col. Jeff Cooper
Reply
Find
Reply
07-27-2015, 04:53 PM,
#26
RE: Revolver Question
***
Posts: 1,110
Threads: 82
Joined: Sep 2014
Reputation: 3
#26
(07-27-2015, 04:25 PM)BelieveIn308 Wrote: I think the beating is more gun dependent. IMHO the 45 colt has way less kick that a .44 magnum.
Agreed
(07-27-2015, 04:25 PM)BelieveIn308 Wrote: I think the beating is more gun dependent. IMHO the 45 colt has way less kick that a .44 magnum.Agreed
Reply
Find
Reply
07-27-2015, 06:11 PM,
#27
RE: Revolver Question
**
Posts: 607
Threads: 35
Joined: Jan 2015
Reputation: 0
#27
I have to agree as well. A .45 Colt doesn't have anywhere near the recoil of a .44 magnum.
Reply
Find
Reply
08-11-2015, 11:47 PM,
#28
RE: Revolver Question
***
Posts: 1,110
Threads: 82
Joined: Sep 2014
Reputation: 3
#28
Ruger is releasing the Super Blackhawks in .480 Ruger and .454 Casull if anyone wants to try something with more kick.

[Image: Ruger-Super-Blackhawk-Bisley.jpg?ec017d]
Super Blackhawks in .480 Ruger and .454 Casull if anyone wants to try something with more kick.

[Image: Ruger-Super-Blackhawk-Bisley.jpg?ec017d]
Reply
Find
Reply
08-12-2015, 06:57 AM,
#29
RE: Revolver Question
***
Posts: 2,216
Threads: 124
Joined: Jun 2014
Reputation: 8
#29
I still think the only revolver I want is a Ruger SP100 4" barrel in .357 mag. I figure that if 6 rounds of .357 mag won't stop it, I can, at that point, probably out run it.
"An unarmed man can only flee from evil, and evil is not overcome by fleeing from it." -Col. Jeff Cooper
"An unarmed man can only flee from evil, and evil is not overcome by fleeing from it." -Col. Jeff Cooper
Reply
Find
Reply
08-12-2015, 08:15 AM,
#30
RE: Revolver Question
***
Posts: 1,393
Threads: 79
Joined: Jul 2014
Reputation: 2
#30
That hurts just thinking about it. If I needed that power I would get the Super Redhawk with the Hogue grips. Power is no good if you can't control it.
Reply
Find
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)

Contact Us | Red Dot Arms Forum | Return to Top | | Lite (Archive) Mode | RSS Syndication